Where is galatians in the bible

Share Download. Paul challenges the Galatian Christians to look beyond the letter of the law. Dive Deeper and Explore More. Reading Plan. Popular Books. Academic Books. Free Seminary-Level Classes. Classroom is graduate-level classes taught by Tim Mackie brought to you for free. You can ask me questions like: How can I donate?

How do I update my payment method? How do I cancel my recurring donation? Why did I stop receiving your emails? How do I find a specific resource in your library? More Questions. After the Flood! It was called one of the biggest archaeological finds in years: In late November Turkish and French archaeologists began excavating the ancient Roman city of Zeugma in southeastern Turkey.

Preliminary surveys revealed that hundreds of other villas lay buried just beneath the surface of the surrounding area. Was the apostle to the gentiles incapable of consistent thinking? Some recent Paul scholars have made precisely this claim. The world of the Bible is knowable. We can learn about the society where the ancient Israelites, and later Jesus and the Apostles, lived through the modern discoveries that provide us clues.

Biblical Archaeology Review is the guide on that fascinating journey. Here is your ticket to join us as we discover more and more about the biblical world and its people. Each issue of Biblical Archaeology Review features lavishly illustrated and easy-to-understand articles such as:.

The All-Access membership pass is the way to get to know the Bible through biblical archaeology. Your email address will not be published. By submitting above, you agree to our privacy policy. Combine a one-year tablet and print subscription to BAR with membership in the BAS Library to start your journey into the ancient past today!

Learn More. Who Were the Galatians in the Bible? Total 10 1 37 6. Tags: Ankara apostle paul bible history church of pergamum city of pergamum galatians new testament Gaul Jesus New Testament Pamphylia paul letter to the galatians perga turkey.

Where it makes a difference is in terms of history. The destination of the letter determines how we correlate Galatians with Acts. In this context, it does affect interpretation to some extent.

Does Paul omit mentioning any of his visits to Jerusalem in the letter to the Galatians? More on this below. How do we correlate the Pauline visits to Jerusalem with his visits as they are recorded in Acts?

The issue is of some importance because we have a historical faith and believe that the events of biblical history are significant. As time passed, however, the province changed. In AD southern Galatia was united with surrounding regions to form a new province of Pisidia with Antioch as its capital.

Hence, commentators in early church history naturally thought Galatians was written to the province as it existed in later Roman history, and therefore, virtually all scholars believed that Galatians was written to the ethnic Galatians in the northern part of the province.

Therefore, the identity of the recipients of the letter has been debated intensely in the last century. Supporters of the north Galatian theory maintain that the letter was sent to ethnic Galatians located in the northern part of the Galatian province. The south Galatian view proposes that the letter was sent to the cities Paul visited on his first missionary journey in Acts 13— I begin with arguments supporting the north Galatian theory, but will also note the counter-arguments of those who support the south Galatian theory.

Though I favor a south Galatian destination, the supporting arguments are not clear enough to remove doubt. We are reminded here of the tentativeness of the historical task since we lack enough information to reach a secure conclusion.

If Paul wrote to south Galatia, then he likely wrote to the churches evangelized in Acts 13— Here I focus on some of the remaining arguments supporting a south Galatian destination, but I note some of the weaknesses of these arguments as well.

We have seen above that the most serious objection to the southern theory is that Acts —35 and Gal —10 are remarkably similar. At both meetings circumcision was debated and the apostles decided that circumcision was not required for the salvation of Gentiles. Is it possible that the same meeting took place on two occasions? Many defenders of the south Galatian hypothesis respond by emphasizing that the meeting in Gal —10 was of a different nature than the council in Acts The former was a private meeting, while the latter was a public discussion.